Japan has announced plans to release wastewater from the stricken Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear plant into the ocean starting Thursday.
Here is what we know about the release, how the water has been treated and concerns around the safety of the exercise.
- Why the release? -
Around 100,000 litres (26,500 gallons) of contaminated water -- from cooling the crippled plant's reactors as well as groundwater and rain seeping in -- is collected at the site in northeast Japan every day.
Some 1.34 million tonnes -- equivalent to almost 540 Olympic pools -- are now stored in around a thousand steel containers at the seaside site, and now there is no more space, authorities say.
Japan decided in 2021, after years of discussion, that it would release at most around 500,000 litres per day into the sea via a pipe one kilometre (0.6 miles) long.
- What has been done to the water? -
Plant operator TEPCO says that a special filtering system called ALPS has removed all radioactive elements -- including caesium and strontium -- except tritium.
TEPCO has said it has diluted the water to reduce radioactivity levels to 1,500 becquerels per litre (Bq/L), far below the national safety standard of 60,000 Bq/L.
- Is that safe? -
Tony Hooker, nuclear expert from the University of Adelaide, said that the level of tritium is well below the World Health Organization drinking water limit of 10,000 Bq/L.
"Tritium is regularly released from nuclear power facilities into waterways worldwide," Hooker told AFP.
"For decades (there have been) no evidential detrimental environmental or health effects," he said.
UN atomic watchdog the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has said the release meets international standards and "will not cause any harm to the environment".
- Does everyone agree? -
No. Greenpeace said Tuesday that the technology used to filter the water is flawed and that the IAEA "completely ignored the highly radioactive fuel debris that melted down which continues every day to contaminate ground water".
"(Releasing) this into the sea will impact the whole planet. Japan would intentionally be spreading radioactive elements," Yukio Kanno, a Fukushima resident, said at a recent Greenpeace-organised protest.
China has accused Japan of treating the Pacific like a "sewer". Beijing in July banned food imports from 10 Japanese prefectures and imposed stringent radiation tests on food from the rest of the country.
While Seoul's government has not expressed objections, many South Koreans are alarmed and have been staging demonstrations -- and even panic-buying sea salt.
The release -- which will take decades to complete -- has also hit opposition in Japan itself, in particular from a fishing industry that fears its exports could plummet as consumers and governments shun Japanese seafood.
- What has Japan done to soothe concerns? -
The government has spent months trying to win over sceptics at home and abroad, with everything from study tours of Fukushima to video live-streams of fish living in the wastewater.
Tokyo has also sought to counter disinformation being peddled online about the release, such as manipulated or old photos and claims -- denied by Japan -- that it bribed the IAEA.
- What else needs to be done? -
The far more dangerous task remains removing radioactive debris and highly dangerous nuclear fuel from the three reactors that went into meltdown in 2011.
TEPCO plans to use robots to remove the fuel but there are fears that radiation levels are so high that they could even disable the remote-controlled machines.
The whole gargantuan process is expected to take 30 to 40 years and cost around eight trillion yen ($55 billion).
burs-stu/aha
Artificial Intelligence Analysis
Defense Industry Analyst: 8Stock Market Analyst: 5General Industry Analyst: 6Analyst Summary
:Japan has announced plans to release wastewater from the stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant into the ocean starting Thursday. The release of the wastewater is necessary due to the lack of storage space at the seaside site. The water has been filtered and diluted, with the radioactivity levels reduced to 1,500 becquerels per liter, far below the national safety standard of 60,000 Bq/L. Nuclear experts have stated that the levels of tritium, the only remaining radioactive element, are well below the World Health Organization drinking water limit of 10,000 Bq/L. However, Greenpeace has stated that releasing the water into the ocean is an experiment, and that the effects of the tritium are still unknown. The decision to release the wastewater is the latest development in the nuclear sector since the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in 2011, which had devastating impacts on Japans economy and its nuclear industry. Since then, the nuclear industry has seen a shift towards the adoption of safety measures, such as stricter regulations and improved safety protocols. The release of wastewater from Fukushima Daiichi is seen as a positive step for the nuclear sector, as it shows that the safety protocols are being followed and that the risk of contamination is very low. Analysts should consider the implications of the wastewater release for the defense and stock markets, as well as the potential future impacts on the nuclear industry. Furthermore, analysts should compare this articles content with significant events and trends in the space and defense industry over the past 25 years, in order to identify any correlations, discrepancies, or notable similarities. Investigative
Question:
- 1. What measures have been taken to ensure that the water is safe for release into the ocean?
- 2. What are the long-term implications of this wastewater release for the nuclear industry?
- 3.
How has the nuclear industry evolved since the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in 2011? 4. What are the potential impacts of this wastewater release on the defense and stock markets?
5. How does this wastewater release compare to other significant events and trends in the space and defense industry over the past 25 years?
This AI report is generated by a sophisticated prompt to a ChatGPT API. Our editors clean text for presentation, but preserve AI thought for our collective observation. Please comment and ask questions about AI use by Spacedaily. We appreciate your support and contribution to better trade news.
